1. trentgilliss:

    I fear the copious media coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court’s handling of same-sex marriage might drowned out a pivotal case the Court is hearing right now. At stake is who owns the stuff of which we are made.

    As Nina Totenberg reports for NPR, Myriad Genetics and ACLU are arguing about the patentability of our own genetic material. As Christopher Hansen of the American Civil Liberties Union argues:

    “A patent isn’t a reward for effort. A patent is a reward for invention. And Myriad didn’t invent anything. The gene exists in the body. All Myriad did is find it.”

    But, it may not be as simple as that. Research companies want to be compensated for their efforts. They want to ensure that their work is protected  from other profiteers. But, to what extent? Can human genes themselves be patented, or the mechanisms behind them? What is the right of companies like Myriad Genetics to be rewarded for their efforts that contributes to better clinical care and our social good? What are the ethical and moral responsibilities of these companies to put patients first and not keep them from their own genetic information?

    Big questions with huge decisions that will impact us and our children.

    DISCLAIMER: I reblog this without fear that the coverage of Supreme Court handling of same sex marriage drowns the DNA patenting case.  That is a confused statement.  Both stories are important and pivotal on their own merits obviously.  I am glad NPR is covering this story, but so is the LA Times, WaPo, Voice of America, Huffington Post and many others

    http://www.google.ca/#q=dna+patent+supreme+court&hl=en&source=univ&tbm=nws&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=CChsUZSII8zliwLAsoBI&ved=0CC0QqAI&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45175338,d.cGE&fp=23ebb2531e106dc3&biw=1440&bih=707

    Let’s see if capitalism once again trumps individual rights, common sense, and reality.  Without rigorous deconstruction here, it seems to me that companies who perform genetic research do not have to “patent human DNA” to make money. (sounds ridiculous doesn’t it) I know companies like Myriad Genetics want to and probably think it is most efficient to make money that way, but I do not believe that.

    For curiosity’s sake, I will do some research on business models and post a hopefully not to dry and nerdy analysis on how this business could work.

    Here is another thought, naive though it may be, how about there is scientific research that is done for the public good and researchers make money on specific applications by Big Pharma, medical corporations, and other enterprises that directly use the research to make products.   That would be Open Source and Creative Common for genetic research.  Unfortunately, they ain’t gonna do that.

    This Op-Ed from WaPo (not the most progressive paper in the world) makes a good case for why Myriad Genetics “patents on human genes” should be invalidated.

    (via beingblog)

     
  1. kathergaga likes this
  2. mbrxo reblogged this from afantasist and added:
    Patenting something that already exists is completely ridiculous especially when it can be shared around so that the...
  3. mbrxo likes this
  4. afantasist reblogged this from beingblog
  5. lighttothelight reblogged this from trentgilliss
  6. brillian reblogged this from beingblog and added:
    Not even going to start on my thoughts on this or I’ll might not shut up.
  7. mhypomnemata reblogged this from beingblog
  8. lovelylittleplanet likes this
  9. pimperfection reblogged this from beingblog
  10. jennasfawn likes this
  11. drdrewlphd reblogged this from beingblog
  12. drdrewlphd likes this
  13. where-the-lights-are-given reblogged this from beingblog
  14. babeandthewoods likes this
  15. breaktheclock likes this
  16. no-more-lost-summers likes this
  17. whisperedsonnet likes this
  18. goriofthelandofoak reblogged this from beingblog
  19. projectthinker reblogged this from trentgilliss
  20. mochte likes this
  21. adignorantium reblogged this from talldarklefty and added:
    Why am I surprised? :\
  22. wearemagos likes this
  23. adignorantium likes this
  24. pandemiclaughter likes this
  25. culturenautique reblogged this from beingblog and added:
    DISCLAIMER: I reblog this without fear that the coverage of Supreme Court handling of same sex marriage drowns the DNA...
  26. talldarklefty reblogged this from beingblog
  27. talldarklefty likes this
  28. blumlalli reblogged this from beingblog
  29. abnormalnature reblogged this from beingblog
  30. spaceturbulence likes this
  31. culturenautique likes this
  32. thebronzebow reblogged this from beingblog
  33. leonardo-matd likes this
  34. goriofthelandofoak likes this
  35. whenshovelfacemetmouthbreather reblogged this from beingblog
  36. lifecomesonlyonce reblogged this from beingblog
  37. cornchilos likes this
  38. shrinkrants reblogged this from beingblog
  39. shrinkrants likes this
  40. youmustfirstinventtheuniverse reblogged this from beingblog and added:
    This will effect many aspects of our society with either decision.
  41. ashtun likes this
  42. foxinglasses reblogged this from beingblog
  43. altrev likes this
  44. achello likes this
  45. glaciersandgalaxies reblogged this from beingblog
  46. jujueyeball likes this
  47. afantasist likes this
  48. kmkubo likes this
  49. maybe-lisa reblogged this from beingblog and added:
    Wow…